• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 1537-1542.

• 科学学理论与方法 •    下一篇

跨越专家与公民的边界 ——基于后常规科学背景下的决策模式重塑

刘然   

  1. 南京大学政府管理学院
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-14 修回日期:2019-07-18 出版日期:2019-09-15 发布日期:2019-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘然
  • 基金资助:

    国家社科基金青年项目“共建共治共享社会治理格局建构的合作路径研究”

Across the border between experts and citizens -- Remodeling based on the decision-making model in the post-conventional science context

  • Received:2018-12-14 Revised:2019-07-18 Online:2019-09-15 Published:2019-09-15

摘要: 摘要:20世纪初的公共政策制定走向了一条科学化和理性化的道路。但后常规时代的科学往往无力提供政策制定所需的那种明确答案,因而也无法减少决策中日益增加的风险与不确定性。当前,科学与政策领域兴起了诸如“知识生产的模式2”、“知识分工”与“公民参与科学”等新兴概念,它们共同指向了专业知识生产的民主化趋势——必须重新开放科学的认知承诺,以一种与传统科学生产模式不同的、强调非职业化与情境化的知识范式去重新理解科学、知识生产与决策,以适应高度复杂与高度不确定性情境下的政策争端。这意味着突破专业知识的规范性承诺和前提性预设,赋予公民智慧与科学专家以能力上的平等地位,在开放、多元的参与情境中实现公众与专家的共同磋商。在科学领域,专业知识的民主化导向的是科学的认知转型;在政策领域,它将突破决策科学化与民主化的两难困境,导向一种更为扩大化的公民参与。

Abstract: Abstract: The public policy formulation in the early 20th century has moved toward a scientific and rational path. But neither could the post-normal science provide the clear answer for policy making, nor reduce the increasing risks and uncertainties. At present, emerging concepts such as “model 2 of knowledge production”, “division of epistemic labor” and “civil participation in science” have emerged in the field of science and policy, which together point to the democratization trend of expertise –to adapt to policy disputes in highly complex and highly uncertain situations,we must reopen the cognitive commitment of science and re-understand science, scientific production and decision making in a different knowledge paradigm,which emphasizing non-professional and contextual application than traditional models. This means breaks the normative commitment and premise presupposition of professional knowledge, giving citizens wisdom and scientific experts equal status in ability and achieving an open and diverse consultation between them. In the field of science, the democratization of expertise leads to the cognitive transformation of science; in the policy field, it breaks through the dilemma of scientific and democratization of decision-making and lead to the more expanded citizen participation.