• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 409-417.

• 科学学理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

科研项目学术价值评价及影响因素研究

王颖婕1,柳卸林1,王雪璐2,2,董彩婷3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院
    2.
    3. 中国科学院大学
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-26 修回日期:2019-10-03 出版日期:2020-03-15 发布日期:2020-04-02
  • 通讯作者: 柳卸林
  • 基金资助:
    科学基金成果应用价值分类及机制研究

Research on Academic Value Assessment and Influencing Factors of Scientific Research Projects: A Case Study of the Ministry of Informatics of the National Natural Science Foundation of China

  • Received:2019-08-26 Revised:2019-10-03 Online:2020-03-15 Published:2020-04-02

摘要: 以科研项目的成果评价为出发点,本研究综合考虑项目产出论文的数量和质量,构造国家自然基金项目h指数,对项目的学术价值进行评价。结果显示,自然科学基金信息学部2013年实施、2016年结题的502个面上项目平均产出7篇被引次数不小于7的论文。从项目申请人特征、项目本身特征和项目申请单位特征三方面研究基金项目学术价值产出的影响因素,结果表明项目承担人的特征对基金项目科研价值产出影响十分明显,特别是项目承担人的学术研究基础对基金项目学术价值产出有明显的促进作用。不同学科的基金项目学术价值产出存在显著差异,项目承担单位的情况对项目学术价值产出影响并不显著。

Abstract: Taking the output evaluation of scientific research projects as the starting point, this study synthetically considers the quantity and quality of papers produced by the projects, constructs the National Natural Science Fund Project H Index, and evaluates the academic value of the projects. The results show that the average output of 502 projects implemented by the Ministry of Informatics of the Natural Science Foundation in 2013 and finalized in 2016 is 7 papers with not less than 7 citations. The influencing factors of the academic value output of the fund projects are studied from three aspects: the characteristics of the projects’ applicants, of the projects themselves and of the applicants’ organizations. The results show that the characteristics of the projects’ applicants have a significant impact on the scientific research value output of the fund project, especially his/her academic research foundation. There are significant differences in academic value output of fund projects in different disciplines, while the situation of the applicants’ organizations has no significant influence on the academic value output of the projects.