从合作迈向融合:民营企业产学研联盟组合多样性

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 中国产学研实践正逐步由合作迈向融合，越来越多企业配置形成以自身为主导、多元创新主体紧密联结的产学研联盟组合。然而，相比于国有企业，民营企业在产学研联盟组合配置行为和结果上存在明显不足。本研究从制度逻辑理论出发，剖析民营所有权性质影响产学研联盟组合多样性配置的规律，并考察了中国转型情境下“政府-市场”双元制度逻辑在其中发挥的调节作用。来自中国汽车制造业上市企业的实证结果显示：相比国有企业，民营企业往往配置形成多样性较低的产学研联盟组合；企业所嵌入的区域市场化程度越高、所获取的政府创新补助越多分别削弱了这种负向影响；而两者的共同作用未能进一步加强对这一负向影响的削弱效果。研究结论为促进和引领中国转型情境下民营企业产学研深度融合发展提供有价值的见解。

Abstract: Industry-university-research（IUR） practice in China is gradually moving from cooperation to a new stage of integration. Many enterprises have formed IUR alliance portfolios with themselves as the main body and diversified partners closely connected. Compared with state-owned enterprises, however, private enterprises have obvious deficiencies in the behavior and results of such portfolio configurations. Drawing on institutional logic theory, this study analyzes the influence of private ownership on IUR alliance portfolio diversity, and investigates the moderating effects of “government and market” dual institutional logics in the context of China's transition economy. The empirical study of Chinese listed automobile firms suggests that private enterprises tend to form less diversified IUR alliance portfolios; the higher degree of regional marketization in which enterprises are embedded and the more government innovation subsidies they obtain will respectively weaken such negative influence; while the combined effect of the two could not further strengthen the weakening effect of the negative influence. This research provides a valuable reference for promoting and leading the IUR deep integration of private enterprises in the context of China's transition economy.

王钰莹原长弘张树满. 从合作迈向融合:民营企业产学研联盟组合多样性[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(7): 1257-1266.

参考文献

[1] 李健. 改革开放40年中国产学研合作回眸[J]. 中国科技产业, 2018(10):17-19. [2] Mannak, R., Meeus, M., Raab, J., & Smit, A. A temporal perspective on repeated ties across university-industry R&D consortia[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(9): 103829. [3] 胡雯, 陈强. 产学研协同创新生命周期识别研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(07):69-77. [4] 余义勇, 杨忠. 如何有效发挥领军企业的创新链功能——基于新巴斯德象限的协同创新视角[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020, 23(02):4-15. [5] Zhang, S., Yuan, C., Wang, Y. The impact of industry-university-research alliance portfolio diversity on firm innovation: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(8):2321. [6] 王志刚. 加强产学研用融合创新推动民营经济创新发展[J]. 中国科技产业, 2019(01):10-11. [7] 姚潇颖, 卫平, 李健. 产学研合作模式及其影响因素的异质性研究——基于中国战略新兴产业的微观调查数据[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(08):1-10. [8] 张秀峰, 陈光华, 杨国梁, 刘霞.企业所有权性质影响产学研合作创新绩效了吗?[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(06):934-942. [9] 苏敬勤, 刘畅. 政府驱动逻辑与市场逻辑的关系[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(11):1979-1989. [10] Yi, J., Hong, J., Hsu, W., & Wang, C. The role of state ownership and institutions in the innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: Evidence from China[J]. Technovation, 2017(62-63):4-13. [11] 白旭云, 王砚羽, 苏欣. 研发补贴还是税收激励——政府干预对企业创新绩效和创新质量的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(06):9-18. [12] 张秀峰, 陈光华, 海本禄. 融资约束、政府补贴与产学研合作创新绩效[J].科学学研究, 2019, 37(08):1529-1536. [13] Kafouros, M., Wang, C., Piperopoulos, P., & Zhang, M. Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: The role of region-specific institutions[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(3):803–817. [14] Yiu, D., Hoskisson, R., Bruton, G., & Lu, Y. Dueling institutional logics and the effect on strategic entrepreneurship in Chinese business groups[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2014(8):195-213. [15] 李显君, 王巍, 刘文超, 王京伦. 中国上市汽车公司所有权属性、创新投入与企业绩效的关联研究[J]. 管理评论, 2018, 30(02):71-82. [16] 李兰冰, 刘秉镰. “十四五”时期中国区域经济发展的重大问题展望[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(05):36-51+8. [17] Bahl, M., Kriauciunas, A., & Brush, T. How do ownership type and knowledge transfer influence success of change? A study of transition economy firms[J]. Global Strategy Journal, 2020:1–24. [18] 江诗松, 龚丽敏, 魏江. 转型经济背景下的企业政治战略:国有企业和民营企业的比较[J]. 南开管理评论, 2011, 14(03):42-51. [19] 王劲松, 史晋川, 李应春. 中国民营经济的产业结构演进——兼论民营经济与国有经济、外资经济的竞争关系[J]. 管理世界, 2005(10):82-93. [20] 杨洋, 魏江, 罗来军. 谁在利用政府补贴进行创新?——所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应[J]. 管理世界, 2015(01):75-86+98+188. [21] 胡文伟, 李湛, 殷林森, 刘晓明, 华蓉晖, 孙娟.民营与国有孵化器服务模式比较分析[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(09):20-29. [22] Zhou, K., Gao, G., & Zhao, H. State ownership and firm innovation in China: An integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2017, 62(2):375–404. [23] Peng, M. W., Bruton, G. D., Stan, C. V., et al. Theories of the (State-Owned) Firm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2016, 33(2):293-317. [24] 汤临佳, Hanqing "Chevy" Fang, 程聪. 民营中小企业技术研发投资的多元目标管理——“循序渐进”抑或“双管齐下”[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(10):1518-1526+1556. [25] Wirsich, A., Kock, A., Strumann, C., & Schultz, C. Effects of university industry collaboration on technological newness of firms[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2016, 33(6):708–725. [26] Narver, J., Slater, S., & Maclachlan, D. Responsive and proactive market orientation and new product success[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2004, 21(5):334-347. [27] 张艺, 陈凯华, 朱桂龙. 产学研合作与后发国家创新主体能力演变——以中国高铁产业为例[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(10):1896-1913. [28] Zhang, S., Yuan, C., Han, C. Industry-university-research alliance portfolio size and firm performance: The contingent role of political connections[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2020, DOI:10.1007/s10961-020-09778-6. [29] Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M., & Ioannou, G. Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2011, 64(12):1335-1343. [30] Dau, L. A. Pro-market reforms and developing country multinational corporations[J]. Global Strategy Journal, 2012, 2(3):262–276. [31] Goldeng, E., Grunfeld, L., & Benito, G. The performance differential between private and state-owned enterprises: the roles of ownership, management, and market structure[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008, 45(7):1244–1273 [32] Porter, M. Capital disadvantage: America’s failing capital investment system. Harvard Business Review, 1992:65–83. [33] Clò, S., Floriob, M., & Rentocchinib, F. Firm ownership, quality of government and innovation: Evidence from patenting in the telecommunication industry[J]. Research Policy, 2020, 103960. [34] Colombo, M., & Piva, E. Knowledge misappropriation risks and contractual complexity in entrepreneurial ventures’ non-equity alliances[J]. Small Business Economies, 2019(53):107-127. [35] Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Inkpen, A., Musacchio, A., & Ramaswamy, K. Governments as owners: State-owned multinational companies[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2014(45):919–942. [36] 樊霞, 陈双丽. 产学研合作更有利于产业共性技术研发创新吗——对USPTO中国专利数据的实证检验[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2016, 33(13):59-65. [37] 乐云, 李永奎, 胡毅, 何清华. “政府—市场”二元作用下我国重大工程组织模式及基本演进规律[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(04):17-27. [38] 赵胜超, 曾德明, 罗侦. 产学研科学与技术合作对企业创新的影响研究——基于数量与质量视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2020, 41(01):33-48. [39] 高霞, 其格其, 曹洁琼. 产学研合作创新网络开放度对企业创新绩效的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(09):231-240. [40] Ardito, L., & Petruzzelli, A. Breadth of external knowledge sourcing and product innovation: The moderating role of strategic human resource practices[J]. European Management Journal, 2017(35):261-272. [41] Haus-Reve, S., Fitjar, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. Does combining different types of collaboration always benefit firms? Collaboration, complementarity and product innovation in Norway[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(6):1476–1486. [42] Rajalo, S., & Vadi, M. University-industry innovation collaboration: Reconceptualization[J]. Technovation, 2017(62–63):42–54. [43] 李晓翔, 刘春林. 中小企业资源配置与创新成长关系研究:行为策略的调节作用[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2018, 30(05):70-80. [44] Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. Is slack good or bad for innovation? [J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(5):1245-1264 [45] Shi, W., Sun, S., & Peng, M. Sub-national institutional contingencies, network positions, and IJV partner selection[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2012, 49(7):1221–1245. [46] Sun, P., Qu, Z., & Liao, Z. How and when do subnational institutions matter for R&D investment? Evidence from the Chinese pharmaceutical sector[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2018, 65(3):379–391. [47] 马凌远, 李晓敏. 科技金融政策促进了地区创新水平提升吗?——基于“促进科技和金融结合试点”的准自然实验[J]. 中国软科学, 2019(12):30-42. [48] Chen, G., Yang, G., He, F., & Chen, K. Exploring the effect of political borders on university-industry collaborative research performance: Evidence from China’s Guangdong province[J]. Technovation, 2019(82–83):58–69. [49] 田轩, 孟清扬. 股权激励计划能促进企业创新吗[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(03):176-190. [50] 任曙明, 李馨漪, 王艳玲, 韩月琪. 民营参股、制度环境与企业创新[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2019, 31(03):59-71. [51] 马宁, 姬新龙. 风险投资声誉、智力资本与企业价值[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(09):96-107. [52] 郝凤霞, 郑婷婷. 产权性质、财政补贴与企业价值研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2019, 24(04):160-166. [53] 陈红, 张玉, 刘东霞. 政府补助、税收优惠与企业创新绩效——不同生命周期阶段的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019, 22(03):187-200. [54] Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S. Selective subsidies, entrepreneurial founders' human capital, and access to R&D alliances[J]. Research Policy, 2018(47):1945-1963. [55] Chen, J., Heng, C., Tan, B., & Lin, Z. The distinct signaling effects of R&D subsidy and non-R&D subsidy on IPO performance of IT entrepreneurial firms in China[J]. Research Policy, 2018(47):108-120. [56] Zhang, Y., & Wiersema, M. Stock market reaction to CEO certification: the signaling role of CEO background[J]. Strategic. Management Journal, 2009(30):693–710 [57] Nishimura, J., & Okamuro, H. Internal and external discipline: The effect of project leadership and government monitoring on the performance of publicly funded R&D consortia[J]. Research Policy, 2018, 47(5):840-853 [58] Broekel, T., Fornahl, D., & Morrison, A. Another cluster premium: Innovation subsidies and R&D collaboration networks[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(8):1431-1444. [59] 伍健, 田志龙, 龙晓枫, 熊琪. 战略性新兴产业中政府补贴对企业创新的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(01):158-166. [60] Chapman, G., Lucena, A., & Afcha, S. R&D subsidies & external collaborative breadth: Differential gains and the role of collaboration experience[J]. Research Policy, 2018(47):623-636. [61] Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1):128–152. [62] de Jong, J.P.J., & Freel, M. Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms[J]. Research Policy, 2010(39):47–54. [63] 原长弘, 张树满. 以企业为主体的产学研协同创新:管理框架构建[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(10):184-192. [64] Qiao K. Institutional logics and corporate finance in China[J]. Chinese Management Studies, 2013, 7(4):631-646. [65] 原长弘, 章芬, 姚建军, 孙会娟. 政产学研用协同创新与企业竞争力提升[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(12):1-8. [66] 姚东旻, 朱泳奕. 指引促进还是“锦上添花”?——我国财政补贴对企业创新投入的因果关系的再检验[J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31(06):77-90. [67] Armanios, D.E., Eesley, C.E., Li, J., & Eisenhardt, K.M. How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2017, 38 (7):1373–1390. [68] 任海云, 聂景春. 企业异质性、政府补助与R&D投资[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(06):37-47. [69] Dutt, N., Hawn, O., Vidal, E., Chatterji, A., McGahan, A., & Mitchell, W. How open system intermediaries fill voids in market-based institutions: the case of business incubators in emerging markets[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2016, 59(3):818–840 [70] 陈海鹏, 刘红斌, 张顺. 产学研深度融合促进高校科技成果转移转化——基于51所高校及88家企事业单位的调查分析[J]. 中国高校科技, 2019(03):4-8. [71] 刘云, 桂秉修, 马志云, 张孟亚, 王小黎. 国家重大工程背景下的颠覆性创新模式探究[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(10):1864-1873. [72] 黄江明, 赵宁. 资源与决策逻辑：北汽集团汽车技术追赶的路径演化研究[J]. 管理世界, 2014(09):120-130. [73] 孟东晖, 李显君, 梅亮, 齐兴达. 核心技术解构与突破：“清华-绿控”AMT技术2000～2016年纵向案例研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(06):75-84. [74] Boone, C., Lokshin, B., Guenter, H., & Belderbos, M. Top management team nationality diversity, corporate entrepreneurship, and innovation in multinational firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2019, 40(2):277–302 [75] Kavusan, K., & Frankort, H. A behavioral theory of alliance portfolio reconfiguration: Evidence from pharmaceutical biotechnology[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2019:1–35. [76] Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., & Markóczy, L. Human Capital and CEO Compensation during Institutional Transitions[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2015, 52(1):117–147. [77] 郭玥. 政府创新补助的信号传递机制与企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018, (09):98-116. [78] 王小鲁, 樊纲, 余静文. 中国分省份市场化指数报告(2018). 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2019. [79] Degener, P., Maurer, I., & Bort, S. Alliance portfolio diversity and innovation: The interplay of portfolio coordination capability and proactive partner selection capability[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2018, 55(8):1386-1422. [80] Moortel, K., & Crispeels, T. International university-university technology transfer: Strategic management framework[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018(135):145-155. [81] Giannopoulou, E., Barlatier, P. J., & Pénin, J. Same but different? Research and technology organizations, universities and the innovation activities of firms[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(1):223–233. [82] 李阳, 原长弘, 王涛, 陈志强. 政产学研用协同创新如何有效提升企业竞争力?[J]. 科学学研究, 2016, 34(11):1744-1757. [83] Jiang, R., Tao, Qing., & Santoro, M. Alliance portfolio diversity and firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010(31):1136–1144 [84] Li, J., Li, P., & Wang, B. The liability of opaqueness: State ownership and the likelihood of deal completion in international acquisitions by Chinese firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2019, 40(2):303-327. [85] 江诗松, 何文龙, 路江涌. 创新作为一种政治战略:转型经济情境中的企业象征性创新[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019, 22(02):104-113. [86] Johnston, A., & Huggins, R. Partner selection and university-industry linkages: Assessing small firms’ initial perceptions of the credibility of their partners[J]. Technovation, 2018(78):15–26. [87] 余明桂, 钟慧洁, 范蕊. 民营化、融资约束与企业创新——来自中国工业企业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019(04):75-91 [88] Mcguirk, H., Lenihan, H., & Hart, M. Measuring the impact of innovative human capital on small firms’ propensity to innovate[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(4):965-976. [89] 虞义华, 赵奇锋, 鞠晓生. 发明家高管与企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(03):136-154. [90] Kang, R., & Zaheer, A. Determinants of alliance partner choice: Network distance, managerial incentives, and board monitoring[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(10):2745-2769. [91] Certo, S., Busenbark, J., Woo, H., & Semadeni, M. Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(13):2639–2657. [92] Tsui, A., Ashford, S., St Clair, L., & Xin, K. Dealing with discrepant expectations: Response strategies and managerial effectiveness[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(6):1515-1543. [93] 王宛秋, 马红君. 技术邻近性、研发投入与技术并购创新绩效——基于企业生命周期的视角[J/OL]. 管理评论: 1-10[2020-06-02]. [94] 樊霞, 任畅翔, 刘炜. 产学研合作与企业独立研发关系的进一步检验——基于企业R&D投入门槛效应的分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(01):85-91+84. [95] Greenwood, R., Díaz, A., Li, S., et al. The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses[J]. Organization Science, 2010, 21(2):521-539．