欢迎访问《科学学研究》官方网站，今天是
分享到：
  • 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053　CN 11-1805/G3
科学学研究

科学学研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 507-515.

• 科学学理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

国家自然科学基金资助的效果——基于论文产出的文献计量学评价

张诗乐,盖双双,刘雪立   

  1. 新乡医学院河南省科技期刊研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-05 修回日期:2014-12-26 出版日期:2015-04-15 发布日期:2015-04-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘雪立
  • 基金资助:

    河南省哲学社会科学规划项目（2012BZH004）；新乡医学院研究生科研创新支持计划项目（YJSCX201325Y）

Evaluation on effect of National Natural Science Foundation of China and structural features of its research outputs

  • Received:2014-08-05 Revised:2014-12-26 Online:2015-04-15 Published:2015-04-20

摘要： 为正确认识和评价我国国家自然科学基金（National Natural Science Foundation of China，NSFC）资助项目的科研产出绩效，将科学引文索引数据库（Science Citation Index, SCI）收录的我国2010年所有科研论文（133769篇）按照基金资助项目来源分为3组，NSFC论文（Ⅰ组）、其他基金论文（Ⅱ组）和无基金资助论文（Ⅲ组），详细统计3组论文数量和被引次数。结果表明，3组论文数分别为63570，42237和27962篇，被引次数（均数±标准差）分别为11.15±21.43，10.14±18.36和6.29±12.73，经Nemenyi检验，任意两组之间差异均有统计学意义（P=0.000），NSFC论文数及被引次数均明显高于另外两组论文，与无基金资助论文相比差异更加显著。对我国34个省级行政区2010年产出的NSFC资助的SCI论文数量、被引频次及其他绩效评价指标进行了比较，对NSFC资助产出SCI论文数最多的50个机构及其绩效指标进行了统计分析。

Abstract: To correctly understand and evaluate research output performance of funding projects of National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), we divided all papers published on Science Citation Index (SCI) in 2010 by Chinese authors into 3 groups according to resource of funds: NSFC papers (groupⅠ), other funds papers (group Ⅱ) and no funds papers (group Ⅲ), and we counted up the number of papers and their citations in detail with these 3 groups. The results showed that the number of papers in each group were 63570, 42237 and 27962 respectively, the citation (mean±standard deviation) were 11.15±21.43, 10.14±18.36 and 6.29±12.73. The Nemenyi test showed that the difference between any two groups had statistical significance（P=0.000）, the number of NSFC papers and their citations were obviously higher than papers in other two groups, and the difference between NSFC papers and no funds papers was much more significant. We compared the number of papers, citations and other evaluation indicators of NSFC papers from 34 boroughs in our country in 2010, and we conducted the statistics analysis on the first 50 institutions producing the most NSFC papers and their performance indicators.