欢迎访问《科学学研究》官方网站，今天是
分享到：
  • 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053　CN 11-1805/G3
科学学研究

›› 2013, Vol. ›› Issue (4): 560-566.

• 科技管理与知识管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

论知识治理绩效的影响因素

梁祺1,雷星晖2,苏涛永2   

  1. 1. 同济大学经管学院；景德镇陶瓷学院
    2. 同济大学
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-17 修回日期:2012-12-29 出版日期:2013-04-15 发布日期:2013-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 梁祺
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金

Research on the factors influencing the knowledge governance performance

  • Received:2012-09-17 Revised:2012-12-29 Online:2013-04-15 Published:2013-04-15

摘要： 为理清知识治理绩效的影响因素,文中架构了以治理机制为中介变量、组织宽裕为调节变量,包含知识属性、知识主体特征在内的知识治理绩效影响因素的概念模型,并基于173份问卷数据的基础,采用分层多元回归,验证模型。结果表明,知识属性对治理绩效有显著负向影响;知识主体特征对治理绩效有显著正向影响;三种治理机制对知识属性、知识主体特征影响治理绩效的过程分别有部分和完全的中介作用;治理机制的中介作用会受到组织宽裕的正向调节。研究揭示的机理对于构建知识制度,合理配比知识治理机制,以使交叠形成的知识治理模式适应知识实践需求有突出的理论启示,同时对企业利用知识治理机制的设计提升治理绩效有重要的实践意义。

关键词: 治理机制, 组织宽裕, 中介变量, 调节变量, 层级回归, Governance mechanism, Organizational slack, Moderating factor, Mediating factor, Hierarchical regression

Abstract: In order to clarify the logic line of knowledge governance performance, we construct a conceptual model including the moderating effect of organizational slack, the mediating effect of governance mechanism, knowledge attribute and knowledge subject characteristic. And this model is verified by hierarchical regression analysis based on the data of 173 questionnaires. The result shows that knowledge attribute is negative to the knowledge governance performance while knowledge subject characteristic is positive to the knowledge governance performance. Three knowledge governance mechanisms have the full and part mediating effect to the knowledge attribute and the knowledge subject characteristic. And the organizational slack has positive moderating effect to this intermediary effect. This uncovered mechanism has practical significance to the construction of knowledge system、reasonable proportion of knowledge mechanism and the promotion of knowledge governance performance by using the design of knowledge governance mechanism.