欢迎访问《科学学研究》官方网站，今天是
分享到：
  • 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053　CN 11-1805/G3
科学学研究

›› 2014, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 1003-1011.

• 科技发展战略与政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

专利密集型产业创新效率体系评估研究

姜南   

  1. 同济大学法学院
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-23 修回日期:2014-01-02 出版日期:2014-07-15 发布日期:2014-07-22
  • 通讯作者: 姜南
  • 基金资助:
    促进自主创新能力建设的国家知识产权政策体系研究;同济大学校文科基金：专利投入产出效率与产业增长和结构的联动性关系研究

Which is more important, input or output?——Performance Evaluation of Innovation Efficiency System of Patent-intensive Industries

  • Received:2013-10-23 Revised:2014-01-02 Online:2014-07-15 Published:2014-07-22

摘要： 分别以专利和新产品作为产业创新效率体系的产出以及投入，分两阶段对2001-2010年间的我国专利密集型产业与非专利密集型产业的创新效率体系进行了对比研究。其中，2001-2005年为第一阶段，专利密集型产业专利R&D投入的技术效率要高于非专利密集型产业；2006-2010年为第二阶段，专利密集型产业的经济产出绩效要低于非专利密集型产业，两阶段的不同主要是由于纯技术效率的变化引起的。总的来说，2001-2010年间的综合阶段的整体效率主要由第二阶段的经济产出绩效决定。文末对此现象进行了分析并据此提出了相关政策与建议。

关键词: 专利密集型产业, 非专利密集型产业, 技术投入阶段, 经济产出阶段, 综合绩效, 二阶段DEA法, patent-intensive industries, non-patent-intensive industries, technique input period, economic output period, comprehensive performance, two-phrase DEA method

Abstract: Taking patents and new products as industrial innovation output and input, it comparatively studied innovation efficiency system of patent-intensive industries and non-patent-intensive industries in China from year 2001 to year 2010. First, the overall R&D input efficiency of patent-intensive industries was higher than non-patent-intensive industries’ during the first period, year 2001-2005. Second, the overall economic output efficiency of patent-intensive industries was less than non-patent-intensive industries during the second period, year 2006-2010, both of which were mainly raised by the pure technical efficiency. And comprehensive efficiency was decided mainly by the second period. It analyzed the reason of this situation and gave recommendations and suggestions at the end of the paper.

中图分类号: