• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

›› 2014, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 1281-1288.

• 科学学理论与方法 •    下一篇

东亚STS的独特性——从傅大为与安德森之争谈起

汪阳,柯文   

  1. 南京大学哲学系
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-10 修回日期:2014-06-18 出版日期:2014-09-15 发布日期:2014-09-17
  • 通讯作者: 汪阳
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目;国家社科基金重大项目

The Distinction of East Asian STS--The Debate between Fu Daiwie and Warwick Anderson

  • Received:2014-03-10 Revised:2014-06-18 Online:2014-09-15 Published:2014-09-17

摘要: 台湾国立阳明大学从2007年开始出版的《东亚科学、技术与社会:一份国际期刊》(East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal,EASTS)杂志,目前已经成为国际STS研究的主要刊物之一。时任主编傅大为教授在创刊之初将“独特的”东亚STS的建设作为创刊目标,设定了东亚STS研究的特殊空间、对象和方法论;而以安德森(Warwick Anderson)为首的一批后殖民学者对傅大为提出的东亚STS独特性提出异议。本文梳理了傅大为与安德森的争论要点,通过对2007年至2012年EASTS的主题讨论进行统计分析,考察EASTS在哪些方面达到了傅大为教授所设想的东亚STS独特性?哪些方面没有?最后,对这些未能达到的目标进行理论分析。

关键词: 关键词:东亚STS独特性, 东亚STS, 全球化, Key Words: the Distinction of East Asian STS, East Asian STS, Globalization

Abstract: National Yang-Ming University in Taiwan has published the East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal (EASTS) from 2007, the journal has become one of the most important journals of international STS research nowadays. Professor Fu Daiwie, then the chief edtor of the journal is targeting the “distinctive” East Asian STS as the purpose of this magazine at the very inception of this publication, and setted up the special space, object and methodology of East Asian STS research; however, Warwick Anderson led a group of postcolonial scholars to raise an objection to the distinction of East Asian STS. This essay display the points of their debate, then by calculate and analyze the special issues of EASTS from 2007 to 2012, investigate which points of the distinction of East Asian STS that Fu Daiwie has proposed are reached? which are not? Finally, analyze the reasons.

中图分类号: