• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 1836-1845.

• 科技发展战略与政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

是高效率还是低成本?——华为追赶爱立信

陈德智,刘辉   

  1. 上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院
  • 收稿日期:2014-02-19 修回日期:2014-07-11 出版日期:2014-12-15 发布日期:2014-12-17
  • 通讯作者: 陈德智
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172132)

High Efficiency or Low Cost?——Huawei’s Technological Catch-up with Ericsson

  • Received:2014-02-19 Revised:2014-07-11 Online:2014-12-15 Published:2014-12-17

摘要: 在关于技术赶超的研究文献中,还没有以中国企业进行实证研究的;本文所研究的华为公司,从1988年创立到2009年的20年间,以持续高效率的R&D投入,取得了在核心技术领域专利数量、市场份额等全球领先,实现了技术赶超;为什么会取得这样的业绩?本文以爱立信作为华为技术追赶的标杆企业,运用道格拉斯模型计算2002-2009年间R&D投资对销售收入的产出弹性;同时,以描述统计方式,对华为与爱立信进行了R&D经费、人员投入和专利产出的趋势分析;分析结果表明,华为在持续高额R&D投入的同时取得了持续的高投入产出效率,其R&D投入产出弹性为0.85,远远高于爱立信(-1.0),表明华为的R&D投入产出效率远高于爱立信;但同时,随着爱立信的R&D人员数量的减少,华为的R&D人员数量却迅速增加,在人员数量与工作量的投入远高于爱立信,人均专利申请数量却只是爱立信的一半;通过对研究结果的理论分析后发现,华为实现技术赶超的主要原因在于持续稳定的R&D经费和高比重、低成本R&D人员投入,明确的技术战略和先进的技术管理,有效的专一化、低成本与差异化的战略组合,在行业环境变化、领先者发展趋缓的时候,实现了技术赶超。

Abstract: There has yet any empirical research about technological catch-up being conducted on basis of Chinese enterprises. And the case this article studies is Huawei Company. Over the past two decades from its initial foundation in 1988 to 2009, Huawei Company has been making constant high-efficiency R&D investment; it has not only achieved global leading position for patent quantity and market share in field of core technology but also realized the technological catch-up for. Why can Huawei accomplish such achievement? This article takes Ericsson as the benchmarking enterprise which Huawei pursues and uses the Douglas model to calculate the R&D investment output elasticity for marketing revenue during the period from 2000 to 2009. Moreover, this article makes a tendency analysis of R&D expenses, personnel investment and patent output between Huawei and Ericsson via descriptive statistics. The analysis shows that Huawei has achieved a continuously high investment-output efficiency while maintaining its constant and large-amount R&D investment. Its output elasticity of R&D investment is 0.85, which is far higher than that of Ericsson (-1.0), demonstrating the output efficiecy of Huawei’s R&D investment is far higher than that of Ericsson. When Ericsson downsized its R&D personnel, Huawei increased theirs rapidly, which means the latter’s investment in staff employment and work hours exceeded that of Ericsson. Yet, the outcome indicates that Huawei’s per capita number of patent application is only half of that of Ericsson. A theoretical analysis of research result proves that the main reasons for Huawei’s technological catch-up lie in its constant and stable R&D expenses, high-proportion and low-cost R&D personnel investment, specific technological strategy and advanced technology management. Effective strategic combination of simplification, low cost and differentiation enabled Huawei to achieve its technological catch-up under the circumstance of industry environment changes and development of the leading competitors decelerates.