• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 1846-1858.

• 科技发展战略与政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

知识产权保护提高了出口技术复杂度吗?来自中国省际层面的经验研究

代中强   

  1. 集美大学财经学院
  • 收稿日期:2014-02-19 修回日期:2014-06-02 出版日期:2014-12-15 发布日期:2014-12-17
  • 通讯作者: 代中强
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目(71303092);国家社科基金一般项目(10BJL007);教育部人文社科青年基金项目(13YJCZH026)

Does the Heterogeneous Real Intellectual Property Protection Enhance China’s Export Technological Sophistication? Empirical Study on Panel Data of Provinces

  • Received:2014-02-19 Revised:2014-06-02 Online:2014-12-15 Published:2014-12-17

摘要: 摘要:本文旨在研究中国地区不均质实际知识产权保护对出口复杂度的影响程度及作用机理。利用2003-2011年中国30个省份分行业的贸易数据测算省际出口技术复杂度,采用知识产权执法数据测算中国省际实际知识产权保护水平。全国样本的实证研究表明,中国地区不均质实际知识产权保护对出口技术复杂度的影响呈现倒“U”型关系,FDI、在校大学生比例以及研发支出比例的上升对出口技术复杂度产生起到了积极作用,而开放程度以及基础设施水平对出口技术复杂度的影响不明显。分地区的实证研究表明,实际知识产权保护水平、研发支出比例、基础设施和开放程度对出口技术复杂度的影响出现较大的地区差异,而在校大学生比例与FDI可以促进各地出口技术复杂度的提升。因此,知识产权保护和知识产权反垄断一定要并行,但这是一个冰刃上的平衡。我们需要一个持续规范长效的知识产权执法制度,而不是一阵风运动式的短期行动。

Abstract: Abstract: This paper aims to discuss the action mechanism of China’s heterogeneous real intellectual property protection on its export technological sophistication. We use industry export trade data in China to calculate 30 provinces of export technological sophistication during the period of 2003-2011, and then use China’s enforcement data of intellectual property rights to calculate these provinces of actual intellectual property protection. An empirical study on the whole of China shows that the relationship between this heterogeneous real intellectual property protection and export technological sophistication is an inverted “U” type. In addition, FDI, college student proportion and R&D expenditure proportion play some positive role, while the effect of trade opening and infrastructure are not obvious. And the research on China regions shows that the real intellectual property protection, R&D expenditure proportion, infrastructure and trade opening have a big different influence on regional export technological sophistication, while college student proportion and FDI can promote it. This paper argues that intellectual property protection and anti-monopoly must be parallel, but this is a balance on the ice edge. So we need a sustainable and standardized effective enforcement of intellectual property rights system, rather than a gust of wind movement of short action.

中图分类号: