• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 373-379.

• 科技发展战略与政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

论美国大学与联邦实验室技术转移政策的差异

骆严1,朱雪忠2,焦洪涛1   

  1. 1. 华中科技大学
    2. 同济大学
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-27 修回日期:2015-06-23 出版日期:2016-03-15 发布日期:2016-03-18
  • 通讯作者: 骆严

Comparison between Technology Transfer Policy of Universities and Federal Laboratories in America and Its Implications

  • Received:2015-03-27 Revised:2015-06-23 Online:2016-03-15 Published:2016-03-18

摘要: 美国市场主导型的大学与政府主导型的联邦实验室在技术转移中的差异性直接映射在科技政策中,1980年《史蒂文森——怀德勒技术创新法》与《拜杜法案》分别确立了联邦实验室与大学技术转移的核心制度,前者在于“设定义务”,后者在于“下放权利”,虽然二者不断交叉与融合,但仍保持制度内在逻辑的差异性。我国的法律移植过程,忽视了高等学校、国立科研机构与美国大学、联邦实验室的差异,忽视了美国技术转移政策之间的差异。美国的经验对我国“拜杜规则”的完善、国立科研机构的建设具有启示意义。

Abstract: In America, the differences between market-oriented universities and government-oriented federal laboratories have a direct influence on American technology transfer policies. “Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act” and “Bayh–Dole Act” passed at 1980 established the core system for technology transfer in federal laboratories and universities, respectively. The former act emphasizes the “definition of obligations”, while the latter stresses the “decentralization of right”. Although these two acts are intertwining with each other constantly, but their distinct internal logics are unchanged. However, in China, the above mentioned difference is totally neglected during the legal migration process. In this paper, the experience in America is studied to help improve “Bayh-Dole rule” and national research institutions construction in China.

Key words: &ldquo, Bayh&ndash, Dole Act&rdquo