• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 1027-1035.

• 科技发展战略与政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

研发对技术进步的非对称驱动效应研究

张同斌1,李金凯2,3   

  1. 1. 东北财经大学
    2. 东北财经大学数学与数量经济学院
    3.
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-17 修回日期:2015-11-15 出版日期:2016-07-15 发布日期:2016-07-22
  • 通讯作者: 张同斌
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目;辽宁省高等学校优秀人才支持计划

The Asymmetric Driving Effects of R&D on Technical Progress

  • Received:2015-08-17 Revised:2015-11-15 Online:2016-07-15 Published:2016-07-22

摘要: 采用技术相似度测算研发溢出效应,基于面板平滑转换模型,对技术差距变动下高技术产业中研发等驱动技术进步的路径、方向和程度进行了研究。结论认为,在技术差距的影响下,研发对技术进步率呈现非对称的正向影响,但研发投入结构失衡矛盾凸显等因素导致研发有效性程度不断下降。随着技术差距的变动,人力资本通过“协同效应”、“学习效应”对技术进步率具有差异化的促进作用。虽然缩小技术差距能够对技术进步率产生积极影响,但是高技术产业中研发活动的高度集聚现象,不利于溢出效应的发挥,降低了技术进步速度。最后,经济发展水平对于技术进步率的提升效应显著。技术差距为技术进步提供了增长空间,各地区应选取适宜的高技术进行引进,推动不同地区间高技术产业的协同创新,实现创新驱动技术进步和产出增长。

Abstract: With technology similarity measuring R&D spillover effects, the various paths and influences of R&D and other resources on technological progress were discussed based on Panel Smooth Transition Regression (PSTR) Model. The results show that technology gap has an asymmetric and positive effect on technological progress rate under the influence of technology gap in the high-tech industry. With the changes of the technology gap, human capital plays a diverse role in technological progress rate through the “collaboration effects” and “learning effects”. Although narrowing the technology gap can promote the technological progress, the high concentration of R&D activities in high-tech industry is not conducive to spillover effect and thus reduces the speed of technological progress. In the end, economic growth can make a contribution to the technological progress. Technology gap creates space for technological progress. Therefore, in order to realize technological progress as well as economic growth, each province should introduce the appropriate high technology and promote the collaborative innovation with other regions.