• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 1614-1622.

• 科学学理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

行政职务对我国科研人员论文发表的影响

马缨   

  1. 中国科学技术发展战略研究院
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-21 修回日期:2017-04-21 出版日期:2017-11-15 发布日期:2017-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 马缨
  • 基金资助:

    青年科学基金

Science and Society: the Case of the Effects of Administrative Position on Paper Publications of Chinese Scientists

  • Received:2016-11-21 Revised:2017-04-21 Online:2017-11-15 Published:2017-11-15

摘要: 布尔迪厄的“科学场”理论认为,政治资本在不同独立性的科学场中的作用存在差异。以科学家的论文发表数量为考察对象,本文研究在具有不同独立性差异的科学“子场”中,行政职务因素的作用。以学科和期刊层次区分两种“子场”的独立性差异,并利用一项针对我国科研人员的调查数据,研究结果验证了行政职务作用的差异,说明科学“场”的独立性确实会影响其中科学和政治力量的相互关系。

Abstract: This paper drew on the theory of ‘scientific field’ by Bourdieu, proposed the hypothesis that in scientific field of different levels of autonomy the political capital would have different effects. To test this hypothesis, this paper focused on the number of papers published by scientists within the last three years and examined the different effects of administration position factor in publishing ‘fields’ of different autonomy. The paper distinguished two types of ‘fields’ of different autonomy, which is discipline and the level of journals. Using the data from a survey on Chinese scientists, the different effects of administration position were proved, conforming that the autonomy of scientific field will influence the relationships between scientific and political powers of the field.