• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 457-465.

• 科技发展战略与政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

政府补贴与投资效率的金融错配门槛效应研究

刘亭立1,孔嘉欣1,杨松令2,2,蔡娇娇1,2   

  1. 1. 北京工业大学
    2.
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-03 修回日期:2019-10-07 出版日期:2020-03-15 发布日期:2020-04-02
  • 通讯作者: 孔嘉欣
  • 基金资助:
    新时代背景下跨层次公司社会网络对双元创新的影响研究;北京市战略性新兴产业的资本配置效率研究

The Research of Financial Misallocation’s Threshold Effect on The Government Subsidy to the Investment Efficiency——Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies of Strategic Emerging Industries

  • Received:2019-04-03 Revised:2019-10-07 Online:2020-03-15 Published:2020-04-02

摘要: 本文以战略性新兴企业为研究对象,通过门槛回归模型,检验了金融错配对政府补贴效应的影响。研究发现:(1)由于信息不对称导致的逆向选择和道德风险,政府补贴并非总是能促进企业投资效率的提升,即政府补贴效应存在非效率性;(2)金融错配是影响政府补贴效率的主要环境因素;(3)金融错配对政府补贴效果的影响存在显著的非对称倒“U”型双门槛效应:在显著左偏错配区域内,政府补贴具有积极的正效应,促进企业投资效率的提升;在显著右偏错配区域内,政府补贴的非效率性较为突出。本文研究证实了金融资源配置通过金融加速器对政策引导具有相机调节作用。

Abstract: This paper takes the strategic emerging industries (SEI) as the research object to examines the impact of financial misallocation on the efficiency of government subsidies through the panel threshold model. The research finds that, (1) Government subsidies do not always promote the efficiency of corporate investment due to adverse selection and moral hazard; (2) Financial misallocation is a main environmental factor affecting the efficiency of government subsidies; (3) the effect of financial misallocation on government subsidies has significant asymmetric inverted "U" type and double threshold effect: if the misallocation in the left avertence areas, government subsidies have positive effect which can promote the corporate investment efficiency; if it in mildly bad areas, Government subsidies have a slight non efficiency effect; but if it in right avertence misallocation areas, government subsidies will not show significant efficiency results, leading to serious investment efficiency losses. This research confirm that the allocation of financial resources has a moderating effect on the policy guidance.