• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 1791-1799.

• 科技发展战略与政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国吸引外资研发机构政策的多维量化分析

崔宏轶1,张超1,耿旭2   

  1. 1. 深圳大学
    2.
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-23 修回日期:2020-06-08 出版日期:2020-10-15 发布日期:2020-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 崔宏轶
  • 基金资助:

    中国经济特区发展史(1978-2018

Research on China's Policy of Attracting Foreign Investment in R&D Institutions Based on Multidimensional Quantitative Analysis

  • Received:2020-02-23 Revised:2020-06-08 Online:2020-10-15 Published:2020-10-15

摘要: 本文选取中国政府于2012-2019年颁布63份政策文本为研究对象,以创新活动最集中的北京、上海、深圳作为样本,构建政策主体、政策目标、政策对象及政策工具四维研究框架,以政策收集—政策分析—政策评估—政策优化为研究脉络,对中国吸引外资研发机构政策进行量化分析和文本挖掘。研究结果显示:政策扶持更加精准和全面,政策主体之间的关联性增强,机构合作更加广泛和深入;政策目标呈现多维性,重点在于获取创新资源和提升创新能力;政策对象上重视吸引独立企业研发主体,非独立企业研发实体等成为重要吸引对象;政策工具上使用环境类工具最多,供给类工具居次及需求类工具最少。尽管在政策主体、政策目标、政策对象和政策工具方面均存在差异,但随着政策演进逐渐呈现规范化和全面化的趋势。针对现行中国吸引外资研发机构政策弱点,笔者提出提升政策执行力、完善微观政策等建议。

Abstract: The paper selects 63 policy texts promulgated by the Chinese government from 2012 to 2019, uses Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen as the samples to focus on innovation activities, and construct a four dimensional research framework of policy subjects, policy objectives, policy objects, and policy tools. The paper takes policy collection-policy analysis-policy evaluation-policy optimization as a research context for policy evaluation, and quantitative analysis and text mining of China ’s policies to attract foreign investment in R&D institutions. The research results show that the policy support is more precise and comprehensive, the relationship between policy subjects is strengthened, and institutional cooperation is more extensive and deeper; the policy objectives are multidimensional, with emphasis on obtaining innovation resources and enhancing innovation capabilities; and the policy target attaches importance to attracting independent companies R&D entities and non-independent enterprise R&D entities have become important attractions; policy tools use the most environmental tools, supply tools are the second most and demand tools are the least. Although there are differences in policy subjects, policy objectives, policy objects, and policy tools, they gradually become standardized and comprehensive as the policy evolves. In view of the current policy weaknesses, the author puts forward suggestions such as improving policy implementation and improving micro-policy.