• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 1067-1073.

• 科技管理与知识管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

稳定拨款与项目资助的资助差异性研究———基于2009 - 2018 日本化学领域资助产出的数据分析

阿儒涵1,王诗航2,3,李晓轩1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
    2.
    3. 四川大学
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-30 修回日期:2020-04-16 出版日期:2021-06-15 发布日期:2021-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 阿儒涵
  • 基金资助:
    任务导向型与自由探索型科研活动的特征研究 ——基于多重深度神经网络算法的特征提取与分类模型;中国科学院青年创新促进会

Research on the funding difference between block grant and project funding ——Based on the data analysis of funding output in chemistry from Japan during 2009-2018

  • Received:2020-03-30 Revised:2020-04-16 Online:2021-06-15 Published:2021-06-15

摘要: 稳定拨款与项目资助是政府科研资助的两种主要模式。科学分析两种资助模式的差异性,对合理设计政府科研资助机制具有重要意义。本文以日本化学领域2009-2018年,稳定拨款与项目资助的产出所蕴含的多维科研活动特征信息为对象,从研究团队、研究内容、研究产出绩效三个维度入手构建了科研要素视角下的资助差异性分析框架。方法上,引入了深度学习算法,建立了针对化学领域的研究对象实体识别训练模型,实现了对研究对象实体的精准识别,为资助差异性的分析提供了事实基础。数据分析结果显示,稳定拨款与项目资助在多个维度均具有显著的差异性,稳定拨款资助下的科研活动更关注于研究问题本身,而项目资助下的科研活动则更多地体现了科学共同体对项目遴选的标准。结合数据分析结论,研究提出了应科学认识两种资助模式的差异性,合理布局、扬长避短,建立高效的政府科研资助机制的政策建议。

Abstract: Block grant and project funding are the two main modes for government research funding. Scientific analysis of the differences between the two funding modes is of great significance for the rational design of government research funding mechanisms. Multi-dimensional information contained in the output of these two funding modes from 2009-2018 in chemistry from Japan are taken as research objects Three-dimension analysis framework is built. In terms of methods, deep learning algorithms are introduced, and a training model for research object entity recognition in the field of chemistry is established, which realizes accurate recognition of research object entities and provides a factual basis for the analysis of funding differences. Data analysis results show that block grant and project funding have significant differences in multiple dimensions. The scientific research activities funded by block grant are more concerned in the research problem itself, while the scientific research activities funded by projects are more reflect the selection criteria from scientific community for projects. Policy recommendations of scientifically understand the difference between the two funding modes, rational layout, advancing strengths and avoiding weaknesses to establish efficient government research funding mechanism are proposed combing the data analysis results.