科研团队的多样性对团队绩效的影响研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 虚拟化、综合化、多元化趋势是科研团队在新一轮科技革命中的重要特征，研究新趋势下影响科研团队绩效的因素对科技工作者的未来发展以及国家科技创新实力的提升具有重大意义。在广泛的文献调研基础上，探讨团队规模、团队成员机构多样性、国别多样性、跨学科性、资金来源丰富性以及团队不稳定性六个因素对科研团队绩效（学术论文产出数量与产出质量）的影响，并通过实证分析予以验证。研究表明：科研团队产出数量与团队规模、机构多样性、资金来源丰富性正相关，与国别多样性、跨学科性和团队不稳定性负相关；产出质量与资金来源的丰富性正相关，与机构多样性负相关。

Abstract: The virtual, integrated, and diversified trend is an essential feature of research teams in the new round of scientific and technological revolution. Exploring factors affecting the performance of research teams under the new development trend is of great significance to promote the researchers' performance and to improve the national scientific and technological innovation strength. On the basis of extensive literature review, this paper investigates the impact of six factors on the performance of research teams (quantity and quality of academic papers), namely team size, institutional diversity, country diversity, interdisciplinarity, the richness of funding sources, and team instability. The results indicate that the quantity of scientific team output is positively related to team size, institutional diversity, and richness of funding sources, and negatively related to country diversity, interdisciplinarity, and team instability; the output quality is positively related to the richness of funding sources, and negatively related to institutional diversity.

廖青云朱东华汪雪锋黄颖. 科研团队的多样性对团队绩效的影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(6): 1074-1083.

参考文献

[1] 石燕青, 孙建军. 我国图书情报领域学者科研绩效与国际合作程度的关系研究 [J]. 情报科学, 2017, 11): 114-20. [2] 邱均平, 曾倩. 国际合作是否能提高科研影响力——以计算机科学为例 [J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(10): 1-5. [3] 郑如青, 张琰. 北京大学科研国际合作的成效与发展对策 [J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 46(5): 851-4. [4] GLADSTEIN D L. Groups in Context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984, 29(4): 499-517. [5] COX T H, LOBEL S A, MCLEOD P L. Effects of Ethnic Group Cultural Differences on Cooperative and Competitive Behavior on a Group Task [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34(4): 827-47. [6] MANNIX，ELIZABETH；NEALE，MARGARET. What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations [J]. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2005, 6(2): 31-55. [7] WIERSEMA M F, BIRD A. Organizational Demography in Japanese Firms: Group Heterogeneity, Individual Dissimilarity, and Top Management Team Turnover [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36(5): 996-1025. [8] Y.WILLIAMS K, A.O'REILLY C. Demography and Diversity in Organizations: A Review of 40 Years of Research [J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1998, 20(3): 77-140. [9] MILLIKEN F J, MARTINS L L. Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21(2): 402-33. [10] CAMPION M A, MEDSKER G J, HIGGS A C. Relations between work group characteristics and effetiveness: implications for designing effective work groups [J]. Personnel Psychology, 1993, 46(4): 823-47. [11] 何海燕, 李芳. 高校科研合作对论文产出质量的影响——基于国家重点实验室分析 [J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 19(5): 162-7. [12] 王俊婧. 国际合作对科研论文质量的影响研究——上海交通大学的案例 [D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2012. [13] CUMMINGS J N, KIESLER S. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations [J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(10): 1620-34. [14] CUMMINGS J N, KIESLER S, BOSAGH Z R, et al. Group heterogeneity increases the risks of large group size: a longitudinal study of productivity in research groups [J]. Psychol Sci, 2013, 24(6): 880-90. [15] ANCONA D G, CALDWELL D F. Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance [M]. Hanover: INFORMS, 1992. [16] HOMAN A C, VAN KNIPPENBERG D, VAN KLEEF G A, et al. Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92(5): 1189-99. [17] STASSER G, STEWART D D, WITTENBAUM G M. Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what [J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1995, 31(3): 244-65. [18] 张钢, 倪旭东. 知识差异和知识冲突对团队创新的影响 [J]. 心理学报, 2007, 39(5): 926-33. [19] STVILIA B, HINNANT C C, SCHINDLER K, et al. Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab [J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2011, 62(2): 270-83. [20] CHAWLA A, SINGH J P. Organizational environment and performance of research groups—A typological analysis [J]. Scientometrics, 1998, 43(3): 373-91. [21] 王磊. 论大学创新学术团队的核心竞争力 [J]. 教育发展研究, 2007, 33(10a): 61-5. [22] 郑小勇, 楼鞅. 科研团队创新绩效的影响因素及其作用机理研究 [J]. 科学学研究, 2009, 27(9): 1428-38. [23] HALL B H, GRILICHES Z, HAUSMAN J A. Patents and R & D--Is There a Lag? [J]. International Economic Review, 1984, 27(2): 265-83. [24] HEERINGEN A V. Dutch research groups: Output and collaboration [J]. Scientometrics, 1981, 3(4): 305-15. [25] FLEMING I. 英汉对照管理袖珍手册--团队合作 [M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2002. [26] HOLPP L. Managing Teams [J]. Team Performance Management, 2000, 3(4): 137–43. [27] 陈春花, 杨映珊. 科研组织管理的新模式—团队运作 [J]. 科学管理研究, 2002, 20(1): 28-30. [28] 王守栋. 高校科技创新团队绩效评价研究 [D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2010. [29] STEINER I D. Group process and productivity [M]. New York: Academic Press, 1972. [30] PELLED L H, EISENHARDT K M, XIN K R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(1): 1-28. [31] BYRNE D E. The attraction paradigm [M]. Cambridge: Academic Press, 1971. [32] SMITH K G, SMITH K A, OLIAN J D, et al. Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994, 39(3): 412-38. [33] ADLER P S, CHEN C X. Combining creativity and control: Understanding individual motivation in large-scale collaborative creativity [J]. Accounting Organizations & Society, 2011, 36(2): 63-85. [34] PENTLAND A. The new science of building great teams, harvard business review [J]. Time, 2012, 160(15): 76-82. [35] O'LEARY M B, CUMMINGS J N. The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams [J]. Mis Quarterly, 2007, 31(3): 433-52. [36] KIRKMAN B L, GIBSON C B, KIM K. Across Borders and Technologies: Advancements in Virtual Teams Research [J]. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, 2012, 2(13): 25. [37] OLSON B J, PARAYITAM S, BAO Y. Strategic decision making: The effects of cognitive diversity, conflict, and trust on decision outcomes [J]. Journal of Management Official Journal of the Southern Management Association, 2007, 33(2): 196-222. [38] LAU D C, MURNIGHAN J K. Interactions within Groups and Subgroups: The Effects of Demographic Faultlines [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(4): 645-59. [39] MOHAMMED S, ANGELL L C. Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups: examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25(8): 1015–39. [40] GONCALO J, POLMAN E, MASLACH C. Can confidence come too soon? Collective efficacy, conflict and group performance over time [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2010, 113(1): 13-24. [41] 刘仲林. 交叉科学时代的交叉研究 [J]. 科学学研究, 1993, (2): 9-16. [42] SWEZEY R W, SALAS E. Guidelines for use in team-training development [J]. Teams: Their training and performance, 1992, 219-45. [43] 杜静, 魏江. 知识存量的增长机理分析 [J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2004, 25(1): 24-7. [44] VEGT G V D, EMANS B, VLIERT E V D. Team members’ affective responses to patterns of intragroup interdependence and job complexity [J]. Journal of Management, 2000, 26(4): 633-55. [45] 王端旭, 国维潇. 团队成员变动影响团队绩效研究述评 [J]. 情报杂志, 2010, 29(4): 185-8. [46] BLAU P M. Inequality and Heterogeneity [M]. New York: Free Press, 1977. [47] 黄颖,张琳,孙蓓蓓,王志楠,朱东华.跨学科的三维测度——外部知识融合、内在知识会聚与科学合作模式[J].科学学研究,2019,37(01):25-35. [48] ZHANG L, ROUSSEAU R, GL?NZEL W. Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account [J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 2016, 67(5): 111-2. [49] CUMMINS R C, KING D C. The Ineteraction of group size and task structure in an industrial organization [J]. Personnel Psychology, 1973, 26(1): 87-94. [50] LAUGHLIN P R, HATCH E C, SILVER J S, et al. Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: effects of group size [J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 2006, 85(4): 644-51. [51] ADAMS J D, BLACK G C, CLEMMONS J R, et al. Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999 [J]. Research Policy, 2004, 34(3): 25