中国重点技术领域基础研究成果转化效率评估

科学学研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 2160-2169.

中国重点技术领域基础研究成果转化效率评估

吴菲菲¹,李一苇¹,苗红²,黄鲁成³

1. 北京工业大学
2. 北京工业大学经济管理学院
3.

收稿日期:2020-11-21 修回日期:2021-05-09 出版日期:2021-12-15 发布日期:2021-12-15
通讯作者: 李一苇
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目

Assessment of Transformation Efficiency of Basic Research Results of Essential Fields in China

Received:2020-11-21 Revised:2021-05-09 Online:2021-12-15 Published:2021-12-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对当前基础研究成果转化效率评估中成果范围界定模糊，转化后产出质量评价指标不全面，难以确立基础研究成果转化效率路径的问题，提出了结合基础研究-技术研发关联度、技术领域专利质量的LQ-E基础研究成果转化效率评估模型，并对中国重点技术领域基础研究成果转化效率进行评估，通过与美国、日本的对比，发现问题并提出成果转化效率提升路径。研究表明：1）中国重点技术领域整体基础研究成果转化效率落后于美国、日本，呈现的主要问题是基础研究成果转化不畅，技术后续发展能力不足；2）中国农业领域、制造与工程领域提升成果转化效率的路径是，跟踪前沿科技与热点主题，优先强化基础研究与技术研发的关联；3）中国能源领域、网络信息领域的提升路径是，用专利质量全面提高，带动成果转化效率的提升；4）中国材料领域的提升路径是，发掘新的基础研究主题，通过合作研发创造更多的成果转化机会，并保持专利高质量态势。

关键词: 基础研究, 基础研究成果转化, 非专利参考文献, 专利质量, 基础研究成果转化效率。

Abstract: Because of the fact that the main way of assessing transformation efficiency of basic research results is not accurate on choosing basic research results nor detailed on evaluating output quality of transformation of basic research results, which cannot help to form the path of enhancing the efficiency. Consequently, this paper introduces LQ-E transformation efficiency of basic research results assessment model, which combines measurement of linkage between technology development and basic research, patent quality of technology fields. This model analyses transformation efficiency of basic research results of essential technology fields in China on the basis of assessment of transformation efficiency, makes comparison with America and Japan, and gives advice of the path of enhancing the efficiency. The results show: 1) Transformation efficiency of basic research of various technology fields of China are lower than America and Japan, due to the shortage of transformation of basic research results and subsequent development of technology; 2) Agriculture, manufacturing of China are the technical themes that need to strengthen linkage between basic research and technology development, so as to follow the frontier and hotspot of technology; 3) Energy, network of China are the technical themes that need to improve patent quality in order to improve transformation efficiency; 4) Material of China need to strengthen cooperation of companies and research institutes in order to search for emerging technical themes for basic results transformation and maintain patent quality.

吴菲菲李一苇苗红黄鲁成. 中国重点技术领域基础研究成果转化效率评估[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(12): 2160-2169.

参考文献

[1] 陶诚，张志强，陈云伟.关于我国建设基础科学研究强国的若干思考[J].世界科技研究与发展, 2019, 41(1):1-15 [2] Sung H, Wang C, Huang M, et al.Measuring science-based science linkage and non-science-based linkage of patents through non-patent references[J].Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9(3):488-498 [3] Gazni A, Ghaseminik Z.The increasing dominance of science in the economy: Which nations are successful?[J].Scientometrics, 2019, 120(3):1411-1426 [4] 唐五湘.科技成果转化绩效评价指标体系的比较分析[J].工业技术经济, 2017, (1):61-67 [5] 罗彪，卢蓉.科技成果转化效率分段评价与区域比较[J].中国高校科技, 2018, (07):62-66 [6]罗茜，高蓉蓉，曹丽娜.高校科技成果转化效率测度分析与影响因素扎根研究— — —以江苏省为例[J].科技进步与对策, 2018, 35(5):43-51 [7] 覃雄合，杜德斌，刘树峰等.中国省际高校科研成果转化效率时空格局与影响因素——基于网络SBM模型的评价[J].地理研究, 2017, 36(09):1641-1652 [8] 程慧平，万莉，黄炜等.中国省际R&D创新与转化效率实证研究[J].管理评论, 2015, 27(04):29-37 [9]高喜珍, 刘超超.基于政府视角的科技成果转化项目绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2014, 31(12):129-134 [10] 熊鸿儒.我国科研部门成果转化效率的测算与评价:基于价值导向的国际比较[J][J].学习与探索, 2019, (02):114-120 [11] Chen, L.Do patent citations indicate knowledge linkage? The evidence from text similarities between patents and their citations[J].Journal of Informetrics, 2017, 11(1):63-79 [12] 吴菲菲，黄鲁成，石媛嫄.基于文献和专利相互引用的科学与技术关系分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2013, 34(10):13-20 [13]Albert, M.B.,Avery,D,Narin,F.,& McAllister,P. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents[J].Research Policy, 1991, 20(3):251-259 [14] Gambardella, A, Harhoff, D., & Verspagen, B. .The value of European patents[J].European Management Review, 2008, 5(2):69-84 [15] Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. .Market value and patent citations[J].RAND Journal of Economics, 2005, 36:16-38 [16] Ahuja, G, & Morris Lampert, C. .Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions.[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(6-7):521-543 [17]谷丽, 郝涛, 任立强, 洪晨.专利质量评价指标相关研究综述[J].科研管理, 2017, 38(S1):27-33 [18]马廷灿，李桂菊，姜山等.专利质量评价指标及其在专利计量中的应用[J].图书情报工作, 2012, 56(24):89-95 [19]郑思远，王学昭.专利转让视角下技术转移特征指标体系研究[J].图书情报工作, 2020, 64(7):94-102