• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 534-546.

• 技术创新与制度创新 • 上一篇    下一篇

国家中心城市建设提升了城市群创新能力了吗? ———以十九大城市群为例

马为彪,吴玉鸣   

  1. 华东理工大学
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-27 修回日期:2022-08-12 出版日期:2023-03-15 发布日期:2023-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 吴玉鸣
  • 基金资助:
    区域经济多极网络空间组织理论与实证研究

Does the Construction of National Central Cities Promote the Innovation of Urban Agglomerations? Taking the Nineteen Urban Agglomerations as an Example

  • Received:2022-01-27 Revised:2022-08-12 Online:2023-03-15 Published:2023-03-15
  • Contact: Wu YuMing

摘要: 以中心城市和城市群为主要载体的空间发展模式是推动我国区域协调发展的关键。本文从城市创新的视角出发,基于双重差分,以十九大城市群共210个城市为研究对象,实证分析了国家中心城市的建设对城市群创新能力的影响效应,并利用中介方法探讨了其作用路径。研究结果表明:国家中心城市的建设确实有利于城市群创新能力的提升,基于企业、产业、城市等不同层面数据和不同检验方法的估计,结果依然保持稳健。异质性分析表明:国家中心城市建设对东部沿海地区城市群创新能力提升效应高于内陆中西部地区,国家中心城市规模越大对城市群创新能力提升效应越明显,国家中心城市建设对城市群技术密集型行业创新能力的提升效应要高于非技术密集型行业。影响机制表明:国家中心城市建设通过促进城市群功能分工、知识溢出、市场可达性和金融集聚度等途径影响城市群创新能力。进一步研究表明:空间距离是影响国家中心城市建设对城市群创新能力提升的重要因素,国家中心城市建设对城市群创新能力的提升效应与空间距离呈现倒“U”型关系。同时,国家中心城市建设对城市群创新能力提升效应取决于城市群中国家中心城市的发展质量,而不是拥有的数量。为此,要坚持以国家中心城市为核心推动城市群合理分工,积极提升国家中心城市综合实力,平衡国家中心城市的辐射效应和虹吸效应,合理规划国家中心城市的空间布局。

Abstract: The spatial development model with central cities and urban agglomerations as the main carriers is the key to promote coordinated regional development in our country. This paper starts from the perspective of city innovation, based on the method of difference in difference, and takes 210 cities of 19 urban agglomerations as the research object, empirically analyzes the effect of the construction of national central cities on the innovation ability of urban agglomerations, and uses intermediary methods to explore its mechanisms. The research results show that the construction of national central cities is conducive to the improvement of the innovation ability of urban agglomerations. And the results still remain robust by using different levels of data such as enterprises, industries, cities and different testing methods. The heterogeneity results show that the construction of national central cities has a higher effect on the innovation ability of urban agglomerations in eastern areas than in central and western regions; the larger the scale of national central cities expands, the more obvious the effect on improving the innovation ability of urban agglomerations is; the construction of national central cities has more effects on the innovation ability of technology-intensive industries than that of non-technology-intensive industries. The influence mechanisms indicate that the construction of national central cities affects the innovation ability of urban agglomerations by promoting the division of functions of urban agglomerations, knowledge spillover, market accessibility, and financial agglomeration. Further research shows that spatial distance is an important factor that affects the improvement of the innovation ability of urban agglomerations by the construction of national central cities. The effect of the construction of national central cities on the innovation ability of urban agglomerations has an inverted U-shaped relationship with spatial distance. At the same time, the effect of the construction of national central cities on the innovation ability of urban agglomerations depends on the development quality of the national central cities in the urban agglomerations, rather than the number of them. Therefore, we must adhere to the national center as the core to promote the rational division of labor in urban agglomerations, actively enhance the comprehensive strength of national central cities, balance the radiation effect and siphon effect of national central cities, and rationally plan the spatial layout of national central cities.