Abstract: The frequent occurrence of major international events has heightened countries' concern about the vulnerability of their local economies caused by their integration into the global value chain division of labor system. Some countries have resorted to trade barriers and called for "de-globalization" through value chain linkages back to the home country in an attempt to reshape their economic resilience, but whether this is a long-term strategy to help economic recovery or a short-term illusion of a glimpse of the frog is yet to be confirmed. This paper identifies the forward and backward correlation characteristics and functional specialization attributes of GVCs in each country, and incorporates technology spillover and market correlation into the framework of analysis of forward and backward correlation of GVCs on economic resilience by overcoming endogeneity of instrumental variables estimation, and finds that both forward and backward linkages of GVCs favor economic resilience remodeling. However, in terms of source country heterogeneity, GVCs linkages with limited embedded parties and commodity providers significantly inhibits economic resilience reshaping. In terms of the mediating effect, export technological sophistication plays a mediating role between the forward and backward correlations of GVCs and economic resilience remodeling. It is further found that the positive effect of technology spillovers of forward linkages on economic resilience is only reflected in the linkages with innovation activities, advanced manufacturing and service providers. The positive impact of asymmetric dependence on intermediate goods on economic resilience can hardly compensate for the negative impact of excessive forward linkages on economic resilience. The increase in backward linkages will lead to a higher rate of low value-added exports, which is not conducive to economic resilience reshaping. This study helps to enrich and expand the relationship between GVCs linkage and economic resilience from a new theoretical perspective, and reveals the illusion of "de-globalization" to avoid the systemic risk of GVCs from the level of technology spillover and market factors, which has important practical implications for the governance of a country's value chain.