• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 2027-2037.

• 科技管理与知识管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

产学研融合管理策略与关键核心技术突破

王钰莹1,原长弘2   

  1. 1. 陕西师范大学国际商学院
    2. 西安交通大学
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-27 修回日期:2022-09-02 出版日期:2023-11-15 发布日期:2023-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 王钰莹
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然基金面上项目;陕西省创新能力支撑计划软科学一般项目

Industry-University-Research Integration Managerial Decisions and Key Core Technology Breakthroughs

  • Received:2022-07-27 Revised:2022-09-02 Online:2023-11-15 Published:2023-11-15

摘要: 构建产学研深度融合的技术创新体系已成为当前中国制造业打破西方技术封锁、实现科技自立自强的重要路径。制造业领军企业作为引领科技进步和产业发展的核心力量,如何有效主导并管理产学研融合以促进关键核心技术突破,成为当前理论和实践亟需探索的问题。本研究以中国制造业领军企业为研究对象,首次引入管理视角揭示企业产学研融合管理策略对关键核心技术突破的影响机制和边界条件。基于2012~2018年中国制造业500强集团上市企业的数据,研究发现:(1)产学研链路融合和主体融合管理策略均能促进制造业领军企业关键核心技术突破;(2)两者产生互补协同效应;(3)较高的企业权力配置集中度弱化了产学研链路融合对企业关键核心技术突破的促进作用,但强化了主体融合对企业关键核心技术突破的促进作用。本文研究结论为制造业领军企业合理实施产学研融合管理策略,有效发挥不同策略间的互补协同优势以及利用企业权力配置提升关键核心技术突破,提供有益的理论支持和政策建议。

Abstract: In China’s new development paradigm, sci-tech self-reliance and self-strengthening are important attributes of high-quality development, the core of which is to achieve independent control of key core technologies. At present, although the manufacturing industry in China has seen a substantial improvement in the overall strength of science and technology innovation, the situation with regards to the control of key core technologies has remained essentially unchanged. Building a technological innovation system with deep integration of industry, university and research has become an important path for China's manufacturing industry to break the western technological blockade and achieve technological self-sufficiency and self-improvement. Manufacturing leading enterprises, as the core force leading the scientific and technological progress and industrial development, must learn how to effectively lead and manage the integration of industry-university-research (IUR) in order to enable breakthroughs in core technologies. This is an urgent issue that must be explored both theoretically and practically. Going beyond previous studies that focused primarily on the structural characteristics of IUR integration in the context of alliance portfolios and the traditional corporate innovation performance of general types of firms, this study takes Chinese manufacturing leading enterprises as the research object and introduces the management perspective of IUR integration for the first time to reveal the influence mechanism and boundary conditions of the managerial decisions of enterprises' IUR integration on the key core technology breakthroughs. We divide the managerial decisions of enterprises' IUR integration into two types: the link integration and the subject integration, and investigate the influence and synergy of both on the breakthrough of key core technologies. Meanwhile, we also pay attention to the fact that group control and operation are distinct features of leading manufacturing enterprises, which requires greater effort in setting up an effective corporate power allocation to achieve efficient decision-making, implementation, and coordination of IUR resources at different organizational levels. In this way, we introduce the boundary conditions of corporate power concentration to test its moderating effect on the above relationships. Based on the data of group listed enterprises in China's top 500 manufacturing industries from 2012 to 2018, the study finds that (1) two managerial decisions of IUR integration (link integration and subject integration) can both promote the breakthrough of key core technologies; and (2) they have complementary synergistic effects and can further promote the breakthroughs; (3) the higher corporate power concentration weakens the role of IUR link integration in promoting breakthroughs, while strengthens the role of IUR subject integration in promoting breakthroughs. The findings of this paper provide a new analytical perspective and theoretical logic that contributes to a theoretical understanding of IUR alliances, as well as suggestions for additional quantitative research on key core technological breakthroughs. Furthermore, they offer useful policy recommendations and theoretical support to manufacturing leading enterprises regarding implementing managerial decisions related to IUR integration, maximizing synergy advantages among different decisions, and enhancing key breakthroughs in core technology through corporate power allocation. As part of the institutional mechanism level, the government should also promote establishing IUR integration systems, guide the transfer and gathering of high-quality innovation resources to the key chains and nodes of innovation activities, and pilot and promote new organizational models and institutional forms for IUR integration.