• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

›› 2013, Vol. ›› Issue (12): 1792-1795.

• 科学学理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

跨学科同行评议的合理性研究

王前1,李丽2,高成锴2   

  1. 1. 大连理工大学人文与社会科学学部
    2.
  • 收稿日期:2013-05-29 修回日期:2013-09-17 出版日期:2013-12-15 发布日期:2013-12-26
  • 通讯作者: 王前

Research on Rationality of Interdisciplinary Peer-review

  • Received:2013-05-29 Revised:2013-09-17 Online:2013-12-15 Published:2013-12-26

摘要: 跨学科评议的评审专家专业背景各异,在评审非本专业的成果时很难准确和全面。本文探讨了跨学科同行评议的合理性问题,并在此基础上提出需要建立不同学科之间合理的对话机制,保持学术研究的规范性和创新性之间必要的张力,为科学探索特别是跨学科研究创造足够的发展空间。

关键词: 跨学科, 同行评议, 合理性, Interdiscipline, Peer-review, Rationality

Abstract: Because of the various disciplinary backgrounds of the assessment panel in interdisciplinary peer review, it is quite difficult for them to provide accurate and comprehensive evaluation on the research results from other disciplines. This paper explores the issue of rationality in interdisciplinary peer review. On this basis, it proposes that reasonable dialogue mechanism should be established among different disciplines, and for the sake of the enough development space for the scientific explorations, especially the interdisciplinary researches, we should keep the essential tension between normalization and innovation in academic research.