• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

›› 2014, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 987-995.

• 科学学理论与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

历史科技成就统计与“欧洲中心主义”

董洁林1,曹钰华2,茅莉丽2,陈娟2   

  1. 1. 苏州大学东吴商学院企业创新和发展研究中心,清华大学中国科学技术政策研究中心
    2. 苏州大学
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-18 修回日期:2014-03-13 出版日期:2014-07-15 发布日期:2014-07-22
  • 通讯作者: 董洁林

The Statistics of Science and Technology History: Review of the Eurocentrism Perspectives

  • Received:2013-12-18 Revised:2014-03-13 Online:2014-07-15 Published:2014-07-22

摘要: “欧洲中心主义”思维在世界科技史的研究中有重要影响。本研究的主要目的是基于人类历史上科技成就的统计数据,定量分析各地区人民在不同的历史时期的贡献,从而重新审视一些欧洲中心主义的结论。为此,我们首先建立了“人类科学和技术历史成就”数据库。然后基于该数据库对世界各地科技首创成就进行了统计,并就各国/区域在一些历史时间的横截面上的科技活动进行比较。该数据库虽然存在其局限性,但显著修正了一些在“欧洲中心主义”思维下数据采集的偏见,更好地反映了历史上人类科技创新活动的统计特征。我们主要发现是:其一,欧美科技创新约占人类科技创新总量的81.7%,其他地区约占18.3%。这个结果仍然显示了欧美对人类历史科技创新的巨大贡献,但相对于一些“欧洲中心论”学者所认为的前者占97%而后者只占3%的统计结论,本文结果更接近历史真实。其二,基于对各地区历史横截面创新累计和各历史阶段科技创新活跃度的研究,我们认为在1500年之前,欧洲和中东的累计科技创新成就相当,但其他地区如中国和印度等不如欧洲。因此部分支持、也部分否定了一些反“欧洲中心论”学者所提出的1500之前,“世界各地科技水平相当”的观点。

关键词: 科技创新, 科学史, 技术史, 欧洲中心主义, 欧洲中心论, Technology innovation, Science history, Technology history, Eurocentrist, Eurocentrism

Abstract: Eurocentrism has strong influence in the field of science and technology history. The primary objective of this study is to establish quantitative evidence that will enhance a better understanding of the statistical characters of scientific and technological innovations in world history, and to re-examine some conclusions made by scholars with Eurocentrism perspectives. In order to achieve this goal, we examined both scientific and technological achievements in human history and established a database from which statistical evidences are drawn for the purpose of comparison among countries and regions. Our findings are quite incisive and informative. First, our findings indicate that people in North America and Europe have contributed about 81.7 percent of the total inventories of science and technological achievements in human history. The balance of 18.3 percent can be traced to all other regions that have been neglected by earlier scholars. This rectifies earlier claims that Europe and North America’s achievements account for 97 percent of the global innovations. Second, based on the cross-section analysis of the historical achievements in sciences and technology, our findings show that prior to 1500 AD, Europe’s and Middle East’s innovations were basically at par, but these achievements surpass those from other regions like China and India/Pakistan. These partially support the perceptions put forward by some anti-Eurocentric scholars.

中图分类号: