标准驱动技术轨道演进的过程和机制研究———基于V2X 技术的实证分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 数字技术和传统产业的融合发展不仅引入了突破性的产品和服务，还从根本上改变着产业创新的过程和方式。本文以V2X技术为研究样本，深入分析了数字技术相关产业技术轨道的变异生成、竞争和选择过程，揭示了技术标准在技术轨道演进过程中的作用过程和机制。研究结果表明：V2X技术的发展经历了萌芽期、DSRC技术主导期和C-V2X主导技术轨道确立三个阶段，技术标准是V2X技术轨道演进、竞争和选择的重要推动力量，其驱动作用主要通过标准的应用能力、转化能力、引导能力和扩散能力四种机制来实现。研究结论对把握产业发展机遇、获取数字经济发展新动能具有重要启示。

Abstract: The integration of digital technology and traditional industries not only introduces breakthrough products and services, but also fundamentally changes the process and modes of industrial innovation. Using V2X technology as a research sample, this article analyzed the generation, development, and selection process of the technological trajectory of the digital economy-related industries, and revealed the process and mechanism of technical standards in the evolution of the technological trajectory. The research results show that the development of V2X technology has gone through three stages: the budding period, the DSRC technology dominance period, and the establishment of the C-V2X technology dominance. Technical standards are important driving forces for the evolution, competition and selection of the V2X technology trajectory. The driving role of standards is mainly achieved through four mechanisms, namely standard application, transformation, guidance and diffusion. The research conclusions have important enlightenment for grasping industrial development opportunities and obtaining new momentum in the development of digital economy.

郑素丽杨璐琦黄群慧王嘉珏. 标准驱动技术轨道演进的过程和机制研究———基于V2X 技术的实证分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(10): 1798-1810.

参考文献

[1] Nandkumar A, Mani D, Bharadwaj A. Market Returns to Digital Innovations: A Group Based Trajectory Approach [J]. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018, 2018(1): 15241. [2] 柳卸林, 董彩婷, 丁雪辰. 数字创新时代：中国的机遇与挑战 [J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2020, 41(06): 3-15. [3] 张路娜, 胡贝贝, 王胜光. 数字经济演进机理及特征研究 [J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(03): 406-14. [4] Kapoor R, Klueter T. Unbundling and Managing Uncertainty Surrounding Emerging Technologies [J]. Strategy Science, 2021, 6(1): 62-74. [5] Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change [J]. Research Policy, 1982, 11(3): 147-62. [6] 柳卸林. 技术创新经济学（第2版） [M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2014. [7] Suarez F F. Battles for technological dominance: an integrative framework [J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(2): 271-86. [8] Murmann J P, Frenken K. Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change [J]. Research Policy, 2006, 35(7): 925-52. [9] Wetzels M. The road ahead is digital for innovation management and there is no way back [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2021, 38(2): 245-7. [10] Argyres N, Bigelow L, Nickerson J A. Dominant designs, innovation shocks, and the follower's dilemma [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(2): 216-34. [11] Suárez F F, Utterback J M. Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16(6): 415-30. [12] Bakker S, Van Lente H, Meeus M T H. Dominance in the prototyping phase—The case of hydrogen passenger cars [J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(5): 871-83. [13] Teece D J. Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world [J]. Research Policy, 2018, 47(8): 1367-87. [14] Kim D-H, Lee H, Kwak J. Standards as a driving force that influences emerging technological trajectories in the converging world of the Internet and things: An investigation of the M2M/IoT patent network [J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(7): 1234-54. [15] 刘宗巍, 匡旭, 赵福全. V2X关键技术应用与发展综述 [J]. 电讯技术, 2019, 59(01): 117-24. [16] Gambardella A, Heaton S, NOVELLI E, et al. Profiting from Enabling Technologies? [J]. Strategy Science, 2021, 6(1): 75-90. [17] 陈山枝, 时岩, 胡金玲. 蜂窝车联网(C-V2X)综述 [J]. 中国科学基金, 2020, 34(02): 179-85. [18] 中国信息通信研究院. 北京: 中国信息通信研究院, 2018. [19] Nelson R R, Winter S G. In search of useful theory of innovation [J]. Research Policy, 1977, 6(1): 36-76. [20] Martinelli A. An emerging paradigm or just another trajectory? Understanding the nature of technological changes using engineering heuristics in the telecommunications switching industry [J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(2): 414-29. [21] 熊鸿儒, 王毅, 林敏, et al. 技术轨道研究:述评与展望 [J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2012, 33(07): 21-8. [22] Jenkins M, Floyd S. Trajectories in the Evolution of Technology: A Multi-Level Study of Competition in Formula 1 Racing [J]. Organization Studies, 2001, 22(6): 945-69. [23] Fernández E, Valle S. Battle for dominant design: A decision-making model [J]. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 2019, 25(2): 72-8. [24] Anderson P, Tushman M. Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35( [25] 张立超, 刘怡君. 技术轨道的跃迁与技术创新的演化发展 [J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(01): 137-45. [26] Suarez F F, Grodal S, Gotsopoulos A. Perfect timing? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(3): 437-48. [27] 王博, 刘则渊, 刘盛博. 我国新能源汽车产业技术标准演进路径研究 [J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(03): 12-22. [28] Wiegmann P M, De Vries H J, Blind K. Multi-mode standardisation: A critical review and a research agenda [J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(8): 1370-86. [29] Metcalfe J S, Miles I. Standards, selection and variety: an evolutionary approach [J]. Information Economics and Policy, 1994, 6(3): 243-68. [30] Swann, G M P: Innovative Economics Limited, 2010. [31] 曾德明, 彭盾. 技术标准引致的产业创新集群效应分析 [J]. 科研管理, 2008, 02): 97-102+74. [32] 赵树宽, 余海晴, 姜红. 技术标准、技术创新与经济增长关系研究——理论模型及实证分析 [J]. 科学学研究, 2012, 30(09): 1333-41+420. [33] 陶爱萍, 张丹丹. 技术标准锁定、创新惰性和技术创新 [J]. 中国科技论坛, 2013, 03): 11-6. [34] Choi D G, Lee H, Sung T-K. Research profiling for ‘standardization and innovation’ [J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(1): 259–78. [35] 潘海波, 金雪军. 技术标准与技术创新协同发展关系研究 [J]. 中国软科学, 2003, 10): 110-4. [36] Cho D, Yoon K, Seol S. Technology Standard Competition Analysis in the 4th Wireless Telecommunication Industry Using Evolutionary Game Theory [J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2021, [37] 杨武, 陈培, DAVID G. 专利引证视角下技术轨道演化与技术锁定识别——以光刻技术为例 [J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 1-21. [38] Kumar V, Lai K-K, Chang Y-H, et al. A structural analysis approach to identify technology innovation and evolution path: a case of m-payment technology ecosystem [J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2021, 25(2): 477-99. [39] Lu L Y Y, Liu J S. A novel approach to identify the major research themes and development trajectory: The case of patenting research [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2016, 103(71-82. [40] 傅瑶, 孙玉涛, 刘凤朝. 美国主要技术领域发展轨迹及生命周期研究——基于S曲线的分析 [J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(2): 209-16+0. [41] Bryan K A, Ozcan Y, Sampat B. In-text patent citations: A user's guide [J]. Research Policy, 2020, 49(4): 103946. [42] Nemet G F, Johnson E. Do important inventions benefit from knowledge originating in other technological domains? [J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(1): 190-200. [43] Momeni A, Rost K. Identification and monitoring of possible disruptive technologies by patent-development paths and topic modeling [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2016, 104(16-29. [44] Rysman M, Simcoe T. Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard-Setting Organizations [J]. 2008, 54(11): 1920-34. [45] Kang B, Bekkers R. Just-in-time patents and the development of standards [J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(10): 1948-61. [46] Bekkers R, Bongard R, Nuvolari A. An empirical study on the determinants of essential patent claims in compatibility standards [J]. Research Policy, 2011, 40(7): 1001-15. [47] Nakamura H, Suzuki S, Hironori T, et al. Citation lag analysis in supply chain research [J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(2): 221–32. [48] Fan X, Liu W, Zhu G. Scientific linkage and technological innovation capabilities: international comparisons of patenting in the solar energy industry [J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(1): 117-38. [49] Lo S-C S. Scientific linkage of science research and technology development: a case of genetic engineering research [J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(109-20. [50] Aversa P, Guillotin O. Firm technological responses to regulatory changes: A longitudinal study in the Le Mans Prototype racing [J]. Research Policy, 2018, 47(9): 1655-73.