• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

›› 2014, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 1369-1377.

• 科技管理与知识管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

科学基金项目实施过程管理研究——基于质量问责视角

朱卫东1,王东鹏2,刘芳2   

  1. 1. 合肥工业大学经济学院
    2. 合肥工业大学管理学院
  • 收稿日期:2014-02-24 修回日期:2014-05-08 出版日期:2014-09-15 发布日期:2014-09-17
  • 通讯作者: 王东鹏
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学青年基金项目

How to manage the NSFC ongoing projects: A quality accountability perspective

  • Received:2014-02-24 Revised:2014-05-08 Online:2014-09-15 Published:2014-09-17

摘要: 目前国家自然科学基金资助项目面临越来越大的绩效压力,随着项目绩效滞后性和资助年限延长,项目实施过程对于科学基金资助绩效的重要性日益凸显,为此亟需完善项目实施过程的管理。项目实施过程管理能够通过问责项目质量提高科学基金资助绩效。研究发现,当前科学基金过程管理的问责现状难以涵盖项目质量的全部要求,项目组应对现阶段过程管理问责时采取的认知策略也不利于科学基金提升资助绩效。以质量问责视角重新设计的项目实施过程管理机制,能够完善上述不足并解决现有问题,进而保障和提升科学基金资助绩效。

关键词: 国家自然科学基金, 质量问责, 项目管理, 项目实施过程管理, National Natural Science Foundation of China, quality accountability, project management, management of ongoing projects

Abstract: Nowadays, the National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC) is facing the situation of high performance pressure. As the lagging effect of the NSFC projects performance and the extending grant period of project (such as the General Projects), the significance of project implementation for the funding performance is increasingly prominent. Hence, there is an urgent need for improving the ongoing projects management. To promote the funding performance, the management of NSFC ongoing projects can resort to the quality accountability of projects. However, the current situation of the ongoing projects management can hardly cover all the demands of project quality in terms of accountability. And occasionally, the cognitive strategies which adopted by project groups to cope with the accountability are also disadvantageous to the NSFC funding performance. So, this paper constructed a management mechanism of NSFC ongoing projects from the perspective of the quality accountability, in order to improve the current project management and enhance the NSFC funding performance.

中图分类号: