• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 1401-1409.

• 科技发展战略与政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

技术驱动还是市场驱动? ———技术标准国际化推广机制研究

张利飞1,李秋霞1,贺景景2,2   

  1. 1. 湖南大学经济与贸易学院
    2.
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-09 修回日期:2022-08-29 出版日期:2023-08-15 发布日期:2023-08-15
  • 通讯作者: 张利飞
  • 基金资助:
    新一代信息技术产业标准必要专利研发战略与政策研究

Technology Driving or Market Driving? -- Study on International Promotion Mechanism of Technology Standards

  • Received:2022-05-09 Revised:2022-08-29 Online:2023-08-15 Published:2023-08-15

摘要: 近年来,从技术和市场两个因素出发展开技术标准国际化推广活动,是企业实现技术标准“走出去”的重要路径。基于此,本文以全球技术标准国际化活跃度较高的76 家通信企业作为分析样本,运用负二项回归模型,从市场和技术两个方面探究技术标准国际化的推广机制。主要结论如下:(1)技术推广和市场推广的两个重要因素均对技术标准的国际化推广产生正向影响。(2)相较于通过扩大用户基础规模实现市场推广的方式,通过专利许可方式对技术推广的作用力更强。从市场细分来看,国际市场对技术标准国际化的促进作用较为明显,而国内市场呈现负向作用,说明过度关注国内市场会对国际市场的培育形成挤占效应。(3)异质性分析表明,科技追赶型以及模仿型企业通过市场推广机制实现技术标准国际化的效果更为显著,它们更倾向于通过优势产品占领国际市场带动技术标准国际化。科技领先型企业、过渡型企业、创新型企业通过技术推广方式实现技术标准国际化的效果更为显著,它们更倾向于通过专利许可方式带动技术标准国际化。本文的研究结论为目前中国正大力推进的“增强标准化开放程度”、“标准国际国内协同发展”等标准国际化发展战略目标实现提供了重要决策参考依据。

Abstract: In recent years, the international promotion of technical standards based on the two factors of technology and market is two important paths for enterprises to realize the "going out" of technical standards. Based on this, this paper takes 76 communication companies with high activity in global technical standard internationalization as analysis samples, and uses negative binomial regression model to explore the promotion mechanism of technical standard internationalization from two aspects of market and technology. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) The two important factors of technology promotion and market promotion both have a positive impact on the international promotion of technical standards. (2) Compared with the method of expanding the user base to achieve market promotion, patent licensing has a stronger effect on technology promotion. From the perspective of market segmentation, the international market has an obvious role in promoting the internationalization of technical standards, while the domestic market has a negative effect, indicating that excessive attention to the domestic market will have a crowding effect on the cultivation of the international market. (3) Heterogeneity analysis shows that technology catching-up and imitation enterprises have a more significant effect on the internationalization of technical standards through the market promotion mechanism, and they are more inclined to occupy the international market with their superior products to drive the internationalization of technical standards. Technology-leading enterprises, transition-oriented enterprises, and innovative enterprises have a more significant effect on the internationalization of technical standards through technology promotion, and they are more inclined to drive the internationalization of technical standards through patent licensing. The research conclusions provide an important decision-making reference for the realization of the strategic goals of standard international development such as "enhancing the openness of standardization" and "coordinated development of standards at home and abroad" that China is vigorously promoting.