• 中国科学学与科技政策研究会
  • 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所
  • 清华大学科学技术与社会研究中心
ISSN 1003-2053 CN 11-1805/G3

科学学研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 1800-1810.

• 科技发展战略与政策 • 上一篇    下一篇

技术缠结及利益关联的技术锁定效应研究

赵芸潼,杜玉申   

  1. 吉林大学商学院
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-10 修回日期:2020-02-22 出版日期:2020-10-15 发布日期:2020-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 杜玉申
  • 基金资助:

    教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目

Research on the Lock-in Effect of Technical Entanglement and Interest Correlation: A Survival Analysis Based on Technical Standards

  • Received:2019-10-10 Revised:2020-02-22 Online:2020-10-15 Published:2020-10-15
  • Contact: Yushen Du

摘要: 技术锁定阻碍破坏性创新的出现和存活。本文将导致技术锁定的因素划分为技术缠结和利益关联两个方面,应用生存分析方法研究来自Searle Center Database的8106个技术标准的生存状况。研究表明:(1)技术越复杂、适用行业越多越容易形成技术锁定;(2)企业既得利益的锁定效应最强,而技术联盟和政府干预的影响次之;(3)政府干预导致的技术锁定效应在技术生存超过20年之后尤其明显。为了防止技术锁定,建议限制SEP拥有者过度攫取技术垄断利益,鼓励自下而上的多层次技术联盟参与制定技术标准,同时,政府不应过多参与技术标准制定过程。

Abstract: Technology lock-in blocking the emergence and survival of disruptive innovation. Our paper divided the factors that lead to technology lock-in into two aspects: technical entanglement and interest correlation. The survival analysis method is used to study the survival state of 8106 technical standards from Searle Center Database. The results show that: (1) The more complex the technology is and the more industries, the easier it is to form technology lock-in; (2) the mechanism for maintaining the vested interests of enterprise is strongest, while the influence of the technical alliance and government intervention is the second; (3) Technology lock-in that lead by government is especially significant after the technology has survived for more than 20 years. In order to prevent technology lock-in, it is recommended to limit SEP owners to excessively capture technical monopoly interests, and encourage bottom-up multi-level technology alliances to participate in the formulation of technical standards. At the same time, the government should not participate too much in the technical standards setting process.